Originally Posted by Hypertek (Post 10106812)

people coming out the closet =)

very nice RCFC

Originally Posted by red92vr4buckey (Post 10106316)

this thread is ridiculous... all the car's on here with proper fitment, are the ones getting hated on... whatever ignorance is bliss.

i guess some people hope and dream that their cars suspension squats under boost...stiffen your shit.
everyone must like the rice tastic honda fitment of shit sunken into the fender wells with some boxy ass tires.

everyone who actually can drive their cars the way they were meant to be has the same mentality for fitment, so obviously titaniumTitties you should take note.

Originally Posted by RCFC89 (Post 10106642)

Here's some recent pics of mine. Full ShineAuto bodykit along with t2 hood going on this weekend. Specs Varrstoen 18x9 +15 all around. Full roll with a little pull in rear and some major pull in front.

http://i295.photobucket.com/albums/m...ng/10001_5.jpg
http://i295.photobucket.com/albums/m...ng/10001_4.jpg

Originally Posted by RCFC89 (Post 10106642)

Here's some recent pics of mine. Full ShineAuto bodykit along with t2 hood going on this weekend. Specs Varrstoen 18x9 +15 all around. Full roll with a little pull in rear and some major pull in front.

Originally Posted by TitaniumTT (Post 10107009)

Front looks spot on, I personally would've changed the offset slightly and run something wider in the rear but it's a damn fine looking ride!:icon_tup:

Why does the rear look like it's been molested before though? Accident perhaps?

Originally Posted by red92vr4buckey (Post 10106316)

this thread is ridiculous... all the car's on here with proper fitment, are the ones getting hated on... whatever ignorance is bliss.

i guess some people hope and dream that their cars suspension squats under boost...stiffen your shit.
everyone must like the rice tastic honda fitment of shit sunken into the fender wells with some boxy ass tires.

everyone who actually can drive their cars the way they were meant to be has the same mentality for fitment, so obviously titaniumTitties you should take note.

Originally Posted by Zenki FC3S (Post 10107004)

More pics for you to hate.


yeah the fc is dirty as fuck, took these the day after a drift event, soo yea.

Originally Posted by MaczPayne (Post 10107623)

Take it out and have fun with it, that's all I have to say.

I love wide rubber and g-forces, some like the stretch and low. It's all good to me.

Originally Posted by Zenki FC3S (Post 10105850)

My whip

http://i328.photobucket.com/albums/l...s/P1000069.jpg


http://i328.photobucket.com/albums/l...s/P1000067.jpg

http://i328.photobucket.com/albums/l...s/P1000068.jpg

Originally Posted by RCFC89 (Post 10106441)

Funny isn't it. I really thought this forum had potential until all the trolls kicked in with their repeated negative opinions on good drift or imo proper fc fitment. Its sad that these losers continue to come into this thread to bash properly done fc's but just like in other forums they have there trolls. I'll stick to the classifieds and local here where its safe from the chaos. Cars are looking good guys keep them coming. The mods should really consider a Drift section for the forum.

Originally Posted by g14novak (Post 10109021)

1. How many of those cars are running more than 2 degrees of neg camber.

2. How many of those cars are running stretched tires.

3. how many of those cars have the rims sticking out of the wheel well.


I wasn't referring to the height. I was talking about how the wheels were setup. Ride height does factor into stance though.

Those are all PROPER stance cars. The ones I posted as improper aren't.

Originally Posted by Slow Rotor (Post 10109025)

Agreed.

Why the crap are you comparing proper race cars to these busted ass things in these threads. Also notice that none of these race cars have broken headlights that half stick up.

Originally Posted by Slow Rotor (Post 10108969)

Just to point up, this may be in your opinion proper. But tyres that scrape on guards and have to be stretched over the rims aren't proper so stop calling it that. If it was, and actually offered any advantage, every car manufacturer would sell new cars like that.

Originally Posted by Slow Rotor (Post 10108969)

Fc's are in no way proper done when their bodykits are zip tied on and the wheels are sticking out the side of the car.

I'm all for people calling it their own style, but not proper.

Originally Posted by g14novak (Post 10108998)

I love how this "Proper Stance" thread turned into a "Post your stretched tire pics" thread.

Want to see correct stance?

Or how about this

But all of you keep posting your cars with stretched ass tires on crazy offset rims.

THIS! Not proper

ALSO THIS! Improper.

Starting to catch the drift?

Originally Posted by g14novak (Post 10108998)

Just for clarification on a different car. Well use the 240SX for example as its another victim of wheel fitment nazi's.

Originally Posted by g14novak (Post 10108998)

Proper:

What the f*&K happened here.


I'm all for stretched tires and wide rims as much as the next guy, but this is a proper stance thread. Not wheel fitment thread.

is a 18x10 -22 rim with a 225-235 tire a nice fitment? Possibly. Is it proper stance? No.

Keep your drift cars in the drift thread. They made it for a reason.

Originally Posted by g14novak (Post 10109021)

1. How many of those cars are running more than 2 degrees of neg camber.

2. How many of those cars are running stretched tires.

3. how many of those cars have the rims sticking out of the wheel well.


I wasn't referring to the height. I was talking about how the wheels were setup. Ride height does factor into stance though.

Those are all PROPER stance cars. The ones I posted as improper aren't.

Originally Posted by Slow Rotor (Post 10109025)

Agreed.

Why the crap are you comparing proper race cars to these busted ass things in these threads. Also notice that none of these race cars have broken headlights that half stick up.

Originally Posted by g14novak (Post 10109036)

+1

Theirs very few real track drivers on here because their all troll'd away by the drift crowd.


Looks good? Yeah.

Proper? Fuck no.

Learn proper fitment before you troll about it.

Originally Posted by g14novak (Post 10109042)

I posted them because their perfectly clear examples.

Are they built well for what they do? Yes. Is justins car proper stance? No. M-Sports is. Just because JTP's car is engineered and tweaked for his racing style doesn't make it proper.

You go ahead and describe to me whats wrong with the S13 so I can correct you on proper stance.


Think of it this way. Proper standing stance is with your back, hips, and ankles aligned, shoulders perpendicular to your neck, and your chin level to the ground. This gives you the ability to see and move the most freely and any direction. Are you going to go up to people standing like this and tell them their standing wrong while your slouching and looking at the ground?

*YOU* posted cars of proper stance and then mocked what I said about cars with improper stance.

How do you not realize your view of proper stance is completely wrong?

Originally Posted by digitalsolo (Post 10109255)

I love the amount of arguing over a made up club of people who can't find wheels that fit their cars. :)