2nd Gen General Discussion The place for non-technical discussion about 2nd Gen RX-7s or if there's no better place for your topic

Let's generally discuss FCs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-16-16 | 08:31 PM
  #51  
Rot005's Avatar
Rot005
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Flash
Yeah, I didn't have to turbo my vert because it came that way from Japan. The world is bigger than North America, generally speaking.
:icon_tup

Bet yours doesn't flex! Right:
Old 01-17-16 | 03:00 PM
  #52  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,191
Likes: 2,824
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by Flash
Yeah, I didn't have to turbo my vert because it came that way from Japan. The world is bigger than North America, generally speaking.
yes, generally the world is round
Old 01-19-16 | 09:59 AM
  #53  
djSL's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 122
From: Vancouver, WA
Umm, any true 'Murican will tell you that North America is the world, generally speaking.
Old 01-19-16 | 01:57 PM
  #54  
clokker's Avatar
Cake or Death?

iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,249
Likes: 63
From: Mile High
Originally Posted by djSL
Umm, any true 'Murican will tell you that North America is the world, generally speaking.
A true Murkin knows that part of NA is the world, but certainly not all of it.
For instance, California is Gomorrah and New York is the Hellgate.

Obviously.
Old 01-20-16 | 01:48 PM
  #55  
jjwalker's Avatar
MECP Certified Installer

 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,176
Likes: 2
From: Mesquite, TX-DFW
In general, the FC has the most stupid wire harness configuration known to man. Convertible, convertible with air bag, audio system type 1,2,3,4,5, turbo or non tubro, Coupe with airbag or without airbag,Canadian, Federal or California.

The FC is the oldest car I have ever seen with what would be called a BCM today (mazda calls it the CPU). The FC, with its complicated electrical system, has MILES of freaking vacuum hoses and 5 vacuum control solenoids. It's almost like Mazda engineers said to themselves "we could make these electronic but **** it, lets control the complicated vacuum system with the complicated electronics system. I mean it works and it works well, I'll give them that, but when it stops working holy crap.

Most would deride the FC's emissions system but it works and it works really well. It is overly complicated and doesn't need to be for the same emission compliance but it works. My FC has always passed emissions easily. I had a completely stock GMC S-15 when I was a teenager with throttle body injection (fancy carburetor) air injection, EGR and a three way catalyst and it wouldn't pass for ****. It always either failed NOx or HC's. Turn the timing up to pass HC, it would fail NOx. Turn the timing down to pass NOx and it would fail HC. This was after replacing every emissions related component on the engine. I am not going to get into how I acquired inspection stickers for years after that. Living in an EPA non-attainment area is fun.

In general, The FC is a great car, just over engineered in some respects. I does have some pretty cool stuff from the factory considering it's an 1980's car.
Old 01-21-16 | 02:23 PM
  #56  
Casual_John's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 893
Likes: 1
From: London, CANADA
Originally Posted by Molotovman
Generally; I think the GTUs is the best(USDM) chassis and a TII drive-train swap does it justice(similar to an Infini). I've owned every model except for a "sport", the vert ranks the lowest on my list and T-II's are too soft.
Hummm, a GTUs with a Tii drivetrain??? What makes the Tii considered too soft?

I was thinking a Tii chassis with a GTUs engine. Almost the same thing, generally speaking.
Old 01-21-16 | 03:51 PM
  #57  
Blue Devil 7's Avatar
Full Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 121
Likes: 2
From: the burning hot heart of Texas
I think blue is the best color for an FC, generally.
Old 01-21-16 | 06:39 PM
  #58  
TonyD89's Avatar
Red Pill Dealer
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 3,762
From: O Fallon MO
I, generally, would disagree.
Old 01-23-16 | 05:04 PM
  #59  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,191
Likes: 2,824
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by jjwalker
In general, the FC has the most stupid wire harness configuration known to man. Convertible, convertible with air bag, audio system type 1,2,3,4,5, turbo or non tubro, Coupe with airbag or without airbag,Canadian, Federal or California.

The FC is the oldest car I have ever seen with what would be called a BCM today (mazda calls it the CPU). The FC, with its complicated electrical system, has MILES of freaking vacuum hoses and 5 vacuum control solenoids. It's almost like Mazda engineers said to themselves "we could make these electronic but **** it, lets control the complicated vacuum system with the complicated electronics system. I mean it works and it works well, I'll give them that, but when it stops working holy crap.

Most would deride the FC's emissions system but it works and it works really well. It is overly complicated and doesn't need to be for the same emission compliance but it works. My FC has always passed emissions easily. I had a completely stock GMC S-15 when I was a teenager with throttle body injection (fancy carburetor) air injection, EGR and a three way catalyst and it wouldn't pass for ****. It always either failed NOx or HC's. Turn the timing up to pass HC, it would fail NOx. Turn the timing down to pass NOx and it would fail HC. This was after replacing every emissions related component on the engine. I am not going to get into how I acquired inspection stickers for years after that. Living in an EPA non-attainment area is fun.

In general, The FC is a great car, just over engineered in some respects. I does have some pretty cool stuff from the factory considering it's an 1980's car.
generally the Rx7 is cutting edge. i agree, the FC emission system works great, my friends car easily passes in CA, and if i posted pics of the cat you guys would tell me its bad/broken. although in general if you lay the vacuum hoses out, you go in a circle
Old 01-23-16 | 08:59 PM
  #60  
jjwalker's Avatar
MECP Certified Installer

 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,176
Likes: 2
From: Mesquite, TX-DFW
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
generally the Rx7 is cutting edge. i agree, the FC emission system works great, my friends car easily passes in CA, and if i posted pics of the cat you guys would tell me its bad/broken. although in general if you lay the vacuum hoses out, you go in a circle
Cutting edge, ****, It was a glimpse of the future!

In general, The brown foam tape on the wire harness sucks. It generally makes for a generally sticky mess.

Also, in general of course, the interior wire harness is not very well laid out.

In general, the FC has a better drag coefficient than a GT-R, and various other high performance vehicles.

RX7 FC = 0.31
GT-R = 0.34
Koenigsegg CCX = 0.32

Full list here, in general of course...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automo...ag_coefficient
Old 01-23-16 | 09:45 PM
  #61  
JerryLH3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Rabbit hole specialist
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,832
Likes: 213
From: Tampa, FL
Not only does the brown foam tape turn into a sticky mess, it crumbles before it does that. Generally speaking.
Old 02-24-16 | 06:29 PM
  #62  
djSL's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 122
From: Vancouver, WA
The engineers at mazda that decided a 50lb steel hood was a good idea at the time must have been smoking crack. Also, not continuing the J5 paint code to s5's was stupid. Generally speaking.
Old 04-13-16 | 02:07 AM
  #63  
pzr2's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 458
Likes: 70
From: Arizona
Generally speaking... Most of the crap these cars go through is just a consequence of age. The rest is from owners messing up to fix the cars after their age shows through.

^ About that Cd, the sport aero package drops that figure to 0.29. Forgot exactly what's included, but I know it included the front undertray, a spoiler, and something-something in front of the rear wheels. And let's not forget that the frontal surface area of the FC is pretty minuscule compared to the cars you just listed.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Captain_Panic
Alternative Fuels
9
09-16-15 02:06 PM
FD3SR1
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
9
01-26-05 07:10 PM



Quick Reply: Let's generally discuss FCs



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:25 PM.