1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

will 84 tank fit in 82

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-22 | 04:30 PM
  #1  
Badfighterpilot's Avatar
Thread Starter
In Rotary Purgatory
 
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 111
Likes: 2
From: Idaho
will 84 tank fit in 82

just need a simple yes or no are you able to put 84 tank into 82
Old 05-16-22 | 06:37 PM
  #2  
LongDuck's Avatar
84SE-EGI helpy-helperton
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 380
From: Phoenix, AZ
No.
The following users liked this post:
Toruki (05-17-22)
Old 05-17-22 | 09:08 AM
  #3  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,197
Likes: 2,825
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
it should be a yes, but you need the straps and maybe some other stuff
Old 05-17-22 | 12:41 PM
  #4  
mazdaverx713b's Avatar
Have RX-7, will restore
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,911
Likes: 1,101
From: Ohio
The spare tire recess and the feed and return lines changed between S2 and S3. I think you can put a later tank in an 81-83 car but not an early tank into a later car 84-85. The 79-80 is completely different and will not interchange with later years.
Old 05-17-22 | 02:09 PM
  #5  
LongDuck's Avatar
84SE-EGI helpy-helperton
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 380
From: Phoenix, AZ
New guy wanted a one word answer, so I gave him one. The S3 tank is taller / larger to accommodate a 15.5gal capacity vs. 13.x in the S2 and earlier. To accomplish this, Mazda went with a small donut emergency spare in the S3 (*1984/85) instead of the full size spare in earlier cars. This required a change to the rear spare tire well, shortening it to allow for the taller tank to fit. The later tank will not fit in an earlier body style car, as the tank is too tall.

This change for 84 model year and beyond S3 cars was due to customer feedback that they wanted more range in general, and was tied to the release of the -SE model in 1984, which had the more fuel thirsty 13b engine option.
The following 2 users liked this post by LongDuck:
Maxwedge (05-17-22), mazdaverx713b (05-18-22)
Old 05-17-22 | 07:31 PM
  #6  
Maxwedge's Avatar
Slowly getting there...
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 357
From: SE PA
LongDuck speaks the truth. The answer is NO.
Old 05-18-22 | 08:28 AM
  #7  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 31,197
Likes: 2,825
From: https://www2.mazda.com/en/100th/
Originally Posted by LongDuck
New guy wanted a one word answer, so I gave him one. The S3 tank is taller / larger to accommodate a 15.5gal capacity vs. 13.x in the S2 and earlier. To accomplish this, Mazda went with a small donut emergency spare in the S3 (*1984/85) instead of the full size spare in earlier cars. This required a change to the rear spare tire well, shortening it to allow for the taller tank to fit. The later tank will not fit in an earlier body style car, as the tank is too tall.

This change for 84 model year and beyond S3 cars was due to customer feedback that they wanted more range in general, and was tied to the release of the -SE model in 1984, which had the more fuel thirsty 13b engine option.
i agree with your answer. if it needs to be that simplistic, than its a no.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
12arotary.
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
27
02-11-09 07:19 PM
black79
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
2
10-29-07 04:50 PM
riceburner1r2001
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
3
09-05-04 10:01 AM



Quick Reply: will 84 tank fit in 82



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 PM.