V8 conversions ..yes beat to death but?
#51
Hunting Skylines
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Posts: 3,431
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Originally posted by futant
I will have my 1rst gen 5.0 driving pretty soon with some times and dynos on the order of close to 500f/lbs
I will have my 1rst gen 5.0 driving pretty soon with some times and dynos on the order of close to 500f/lbs
#52
Full Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: 18 miles north of NYC
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Manntis
er... okay...
All fast cars have V8s? Man, and here Lotus has been hoodwinking people for years with 4-cylinder land rockets like the Esprit Turbo and Elise, lightweight, nimble sportscars that could do well on both the drag strip and slalom course...
er... okay...
All fast cars have V8s? Man, and here Lotus has been hoodwinking people for years with 4-cylinder land rockets like the Esprit Turbo and Elise, lightweight, nimble sportscars that could do well on both the drag strip and slalom course...
#53
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by REVHED
Why are you quoting a peak torque figure? Give us the torque and rpm so we can have something meaningful... hp.
Why are you quoting a peak torque figure? Give us the torque and rpm so we can have something meaningful... hp.
Are you implying hp is more meaningful than torque? Unless you spend all your time above 5250rpm.......
What is important is the area of the curve.......
#54
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: somewhere
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by futant
Are you implying hp is more meaningful than torque? Unless you spend all your time above 5250rpm.......
What is important is the area of the curve.......
Are you implying hp is more meaningful than torque? Unless you spend all your time above 5250rpm.......
What is important is the area of the curve.......
Now, what rotary owner thinks it's fun below 5krpm?
it's the 6 to 8krpm range that's exciting
#55
Administrator
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Nov 1998
Location: So. Arlington, TX!!!
Posts: 12,974
Likes: 0
Received 61 Likes
on
38 Posts
Originally posted by Winnipeg85GSL
Looks like somebody's in trouble.
Looks like somebody's in trouble.
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Winnipeg,Manitoba
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by mar3
See what happens when ya want to be like Mike? Point taken...observe my new sig, but y'all go to your new home, now, OK?
See what happens when ya want to be like Mike? Point taken...observe my new sig, but y'all go to your new home, now, OK?
#57
jeeeeezus! it's all well and good to poke fun at our pissed-on , i mean piston brethern, but some people seem genuinely pissed off about it! i mean, it's THEIR CAR for chrissakes, they can do whatever the hell they want to! if somebody stuffed a v8 in MY car, then i'd be pissed. unless i asked 'em too.... cuz then i'd be reeeeally fast. what's worse? having some grease monkey convert his car(which he loves, don't we all?) to pistons, or have it go to some schlub that doesn't give a rat's *** how cool the 7 is. then they'd be tempted to run it over with their bigass redneck 4x4! for those who haven't seen it, yes, it has been done. as long as you love your car, do what makes you happy! also, i can't promise i won't make fun of ya for doing it! but i will respect that choice.
" 'NUFF SAID " ~ stan lee
" 'NUFF SAID " ~ stan lee
#60
add to cart
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK & Montreal, PQ
Posts: 4,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Blue Goose
But they shaved off a half second in the quarter mile and cleaned up at the track when they went to the 8...
But they shaved off a half second in the quarter mile and cleaned up at the track when they went to the 8...
#61
Born 2 Brap
iTrader: (1)
This is what i dont understand. If you wanted to make big power in a small car. Why not drop a v8 in a datsun 280zx or even a early 300? Put a piston engine in a piston car. Why "bastardize" a 7, as rotorhead put it? And yes i do agree that swaping a 13b into a 12a car, isnt much better. But AT LEAST IT STILL HAS ROTORS!!! im sorry, but I just dont see the point.
#62
add to cart
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK & Montreal, PQ
Posts: 4,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You'll notice there's not a whole lot of Europeans, Asians, or Aussies doing these conversions.
Americans have been trained by decades of Big Three marketing that the bigger the engine, the bigger the output (though there's not a lot of large blocks and hemis anymore...), and plenty of North American 240zs and 280zx chassis end up with V-8s in them (a shame, really, as those inline-6 engines were torquey and smooth as-is, just a low top-end hp output)
Elsewhere in the world people concentrate on wringing out every bit of horsepower they can from smaller displacement engines, with the exception of V10 and V12 powered exotics (Don't even get me going on Lamborghini - as a former tractor manufacturer selling 'performance cars' with no racing history and poor handling, it's no wonder the company keeps getting sold).
The arguement for putting a V8 into a ReX could go either way, though, as the main issues are
1) cost
2) complexity
3) torque gains, especially when compared to (1)
1) cost - Chevy and Ford V8s are in so many trucks that they're dirt cheap. I've rebuilt 350s for less than $390 CDN (not counting the cost of the engine, but blown blocks are cheap)
2) complexity - RX-7s, especially 1st gens, don't have a heck of a lot to remove, and the long snout seems engineered for a far larger engine than the li'l-breadbox-that-could that Mazda put in there. Yes there are crossmember and mount mods, and a new tranny, etc. but that's true of virtually any engine swap.
3) torque - I love rotaries for their output per physical size, but there's not a heck of a lot of low-end grunt (mind you, the same is true of Honda boingers) For those who love off-the-line snap this is a relatively easy way to obtain it.
Me, I've gone to great lengths to keep the serial numbers of major drivetrain parts in my car matching, and the appraised value reflects that. Right now Pamela is only putting out 160-170 hp but I'm enjoying her as-is, andlove having such a different powerplant.
However, there are those who have completely different goals with RX ownership, and some of 'em drop in V8s.
Not my thing, but whatever floats your boat...
Americans have been trained by decades of Big Three marketing that the bigger the engine, the bigger the output (though there's not a lot of large blocks and hemis anymore...), and plenty of North American 240zs and 280zx chassis end up with V-8s in them (a shame, really, as those inline-6 engines were torquey and smooth as-is, just a low top-end hp output)
Elsewhere in the world people concentrate on wringing out every bit of horsepower they can from smaller displacement engines, with the exception of V10 and V12 powered exotics (Don't even get me going on Lamborghini - as a former tractor manufacturer selling 'performance cars' with no racing history and poor handling, it's no wonder the company keeps getting sold).
The arguement for putting a V8 into a ReX could go either way, though, as the main issues are
1) cost
2) complexity
3) torque gains, especially when compared to (1)
1) cost - Chevy and Ford V8s are in so many trucks that they're dirt cheap. I've rebuilt 350s for less than $390 CDN (not counting the cost of the engine, but blown blocks are cheap)
2) complexity - RX-7s, especially 1st gens, don't have a heck of a lot to remove, and the long snout seems engineered for a far larger engine than the li'l-breadbox-that-could that Mazda put in there. Yes there are crossmember and mount mods, and a new tranny, etc. but that's true of virtually any engine swap.
3) torque - I love rotaries for their output per physical size, but there's not a heck of a lot of low-end grunt (mind you, the same is true of Honda boingers) For those who love off-the-line snap this is a relatively easy way to obtain it.
Me, I've gone to great lengths to keep the serial numbers of major drivetrain parts in my car matching, and the appraised value reflects that. Right now Pamela is only putting out 160-170 hp but I'm enjoying her as-is, andlove having such a different powerplant.
However, there are those who have completely different goals with RX ownership, and some of 'em drop in V8s.
Not my thing, but whatever floats your boat...
#63
Got Boost?
Hp is important!! I don't understand why you all think torque is the do all and say all. When it comes to comparing cars that have entirely different gearing, Hp is the think to look at. I hate it when people take Shelby's comment out of context, he was talking about peak Hp, which IMO is a 'bragging rights' but otherwise useless statistic.
Torque is defined as the moment of force, for rotating bodies. if you take torque 'ft-lbs'(lbs of force X feet) and devide by the radius of a wheel, for instance, you get force in lbs. With that said, gears could be called torque multipliers.
Let me make a point.If you just took, even your 450lb-ft monsterous V8 and attached it directly to the wheels and had tires with a radius of a foot, you would only have 450lbs of force trying to move a 2700 lbs object, but redlines at 5500RPM at the crazy speed of 392.5MPH. Now take a 12A ,100lb-ft, in with a first gear ratio of 3.662, and a final drive of 3.909, take the torque and multiply the three numbers: 1431.5 lbs-ft seen by the wheels divide again by 1 foot, and you get 1431.5 lbs of force, 3.18 times as much as the V8, but relines 7000 RPM at 34.9MPH. Which situation is better? Depends on desired speed. The 12A in this situaltion accelerates much faster, but the V8 goes much faster in the end. Horse power seen at the wheels of each is the same regardless of gearing: 471 HP for the V8, 133.3 HP for the 12A(assuming constant peak torque to redline).
I could take my 12A, stick a 9+ final drive on it(tree-stump puller ), and out accelerate almost any car (and redline it in fifth at 68MPH).
My point is horsepower@all RPMs is useful for comparing cars, and torque@all RPMs is useful for comparing engines.
So my question is, what trannies & final drives are you using? That will tell me a ton more about what you V8 RX-7's are capable of.
Torque is defined as the moment of force, for rotating bodies. if you take torque 'ft-lbs'(lbs of force X feet) and devide by the radius of a wheel, for instance, you get force in lbs. With that said, gears could be called torque multipliers.
Let me make a point.If you just took, even your 450lb-ft monsterous V8 and attached it directly to the wheels and had tires with a radius of a foot, you would only have 450lbs of force trying to move a 2700 lbs object, but redlines at 5500RPM at the crazy speed of 392.5MPH. Now take a 12A ,100lb-ft, in with a first gear ratio of 3.662, and a final drive of 3.909, take the torque and multiply the three numbers: 1431.5 lbs-ft seen by the wheels divide again by 1 foot, and you get 1431.5 lbs of force, 3.18 times as much as the V8, but relines 7000 RPM at 34.9MPH. Which situation is better? Depends on desired speed. The 12A in this situaltion accelerates much faster, but the V8 goes much faster in the end. Horse power seen at the wheels of each is the same regardless of gearing: 471 HP for the V8, 133.3 HP for the 12A(assuming constant peak torque to redline).
I could take my 12A, stick a 9+ final drive on it(tree-stump puller ), and out accelerate almost any car (and redline it in fifth at 68MPH).
My point is horsepower@all RPMs is useful for comparing cars, and torque@all RPMs is useful for comparing engines.
So my question is, what trannies & final drives are you using? That will tell me a ton more about what you V8 RX-7's are capable of.
#64
add to cart
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Saskatoon, SK & Montreal, PQ
Posts: 4,180
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To back up the torque vs. hp statement above, the MLVW I drove in the army (bigass 6 wheel drive transport truck seen in most army movies) has 167 hp, but can go up a 30% grade, fully loaded, without slowing down.
However, as important as gearing is, engine torque is important to start the wheels turning under power, and for snappy acceleration.
However, as important as gearing is, engine torque is important to start the wheels turning under power, and for snappy acceleration.
#65
I can has a Hemi? Yes...
iTrader: (2)
Originally posted by Manntis
However, as important as gearing is, engine torque is important to start the wheels turning under power, and for snappy acceleration.
However, as important as gearing is, engine torque is important to start the wheels turning under power, and for snappy acceleration.
Even Third-Gens are vulnerable on rolling races for the first few carlengths to V8's. The V8's have the Torque to get it rolling, but it's Turbocharged High Horsepower that passes them by immediately after.
Last edited by Directfreak; 11-01-02 at 12:05 PM.
#68
HEAVY METAL THUNDER
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elsenborn, Belgian Eifel
Posts: 3,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
HP AND torque are important, but only in a certain way. If you take a car to dragstrip it's only important to get to the end of that 1/4 mile as fast as possible. So mayba a V8 makes sence. If you are a real driver, you'll take your car out on the track. And not an oval!
What counts is the balance, the handling, the overall car. Smaller, less powerfull cars often outperform bigger beasts on such an occasion. We all remember the legendary Mini, yes? It won the monte-carlo rally in front of many more powerfull, faster cars. Why? Because it was a better car, overall. It was light, cornered very well, and was reliable. If you put 200lbs extra on the front axle, and you're going to a track, you will notice the difference. If not you can't drive, and should have the car tested by someone who can. Don't think Michael Schumacher is gonna believe you if you say 200lbs doesn't make a difference, do you??? Drag racing is fun, but it's far less racing then a difficult track (let's say Le Mans, Spa-Francorchamps..)is. Let's try your V8 beast there.
What counts is the balance, the handling, the overall car. Smaller, less powerfull cars often outperform bigger beasts on such an occasion. We all remember the legendary Mini, yes? It won the monte-carlo rally in front of many more powerfull, faster cars. Why? Because it was a better car, overall. It was light, cornered very well, and was reliable. If you put 200lbs extra on the front axle, and you're going to a track, you will notice the difference. If not you can't drive, and should have the car tested by someone who can. Don't think Michael Schumacher is gonna believe you if you say 200lbs doesn't make a difference, do you??? Drag racing is fun, but it's far less racing then a difficult track (let's say Le Mans, Spa-Francorchamps..)is. Let's try your V8 beast there.
#69
Born 2 Brap
iTrader: (1)
Originally posted by Manntis
You'll notice there's not a whole lot of Europeans, Asians, or Aussies doing these conversions.
Americans have been trained by decades of Big Three marketing that the bigger the engine, the bigger the output (though there's not a lot of large blocks and hemis anymore...), and plenty of North American 240zs and 280zx chassis end up with V-8s in them (a shame, really, as those inline-6 engines were torquey and smooth as-is, just a low top-end hp output)
You'll notice there's not a whole lot of Europeans, Asians, or Aussies doing these conversions.
Americans have been trained by decades of Big Three marketing that the bigger the engine, the bigger the output (though there's not a lot of large blocks and hemis anymore...), and plenty of North American 240zs and 280zx chassis end up with V-8s in them (a shame, really, as those inline-6 engines were torquey and smooth as-is, just a low top-end hp output)
#70
U sUx0rz @ THe IntaRwEB!
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Claysburg, PA, USA
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by rotary emotions
If you are a real driver, you'll take your car out on the track. And not an oval!
What counts is the balance, the handling, the overall car. Don't think Michael Schumacher is gonna believe you if you say 200lbs doesn't make a difference, do you??? Drag racing is fun, but it's far less racing then a difficult track (let's say Le Mans, Spa-Francorchamps..)is. Let's try your V8 beast there.
If you are a real driver, you'll take your car out on the track. And not an oval!
What counts is the balance, the handling, the overall car. Don't think Michael Schumacher is gonna believe you if you say 200lbs doesn't make a difference, do you??? Drag racing is fun, but it's far less racing then a difficult track (let's say Le Mans, Spa-Francorchamps..)is. Let's try your V8 beast there.
--Danny
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: San Marcos TEXAS
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I still don't understand why so many RX7 owners are OFFENDED by pistons.
It is my car, right? At least I don't want a park bench on the back and vinyl all over her, just more power for less money.
It is my car, right? At least I don't want a park bench on the back and vinyl all over her, just more power for less money.
#72
Originally posted by EL PAALO
I still don't understand why so many RX7 owners are OFFENDED by pistons.
It is my car, right?
I still don't understand why so many RX7 owners are OFFENDED by pistons.
It is my car, right?
#73
HEAVY METAL THUNDER
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elsenborn, Belgian Eifel
Posts: 3,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Corvettes do count, but eh, how many of you use a C5R engine??? You guys use a block that was intended for a ******* truck!!! So try at least to use the C5R then. Might be slightly overpriced though :-)
#74
Driven a turbo FB lately?
iTrader: (1)
Well just a few thoughts on this, I like what I got right now, its untuned but runs really nicely! I am however very unhappy at the amount of money i spent to get there.. If I had to do it over I would get something else... I have spent a freaking fortune, almost enough to buy a new car and forget this HP madness...
So in closing i dunno if I will do another car, and dont know if it would be a v8. But if i did another one, the cost would be an issue this time. So draw youre assumptions from there..
So in closing i dunno if I will do another car, and dont know if it would be a v8. But if i did another one, the cost would be an issue this time. So draw youre assumptions from there..
#75
I can has a Hemi? Yes...
iTrader: (2)
Mike,
It's not what you spent to get the HP you wanted.
It's the money you spent to Get what you wanted.
You and I both know a Blow through Turbo 13B could easily put out well over 300 HP to the wheels, and it would have been cheaper than a V8 conversion, (and much cheaper than a Cosmo swap.)
I am using 300 as a figure because you feel that's about what you're putting down.
I know several 12A (Blow-Through) Turbos that run 11's all day, and a few that run high 10's. They have less than a third into their system than what I have into mine so far. And when I am finished, they are still going to give a hell of a run for my money.
I had a budget, blew by it, and then just decided to keep going until I got what I wanted. What I want is not a High HP FB, I wanted a High HP ROTARY TURBO FB.
It's not what it costs, it's what you're willing to spend.
It's not what you spent to get the HP you wanted.
It's the money you spent to Get what you wanted.
You and I both know a Blow through Turbo 13B could easily put out well over 300 HP to the wheels, and it would have been cheaper than a V8 conversion, (and much cheaper than a Cosmo swap.)
I am using 300 as a figure because you feel that's about what you're putting down.
I know several 12A (Blow-Through) Turbos that run 11's all day, and a few that run high 10's. They have less than a third into their system than what I have into mine so far. And when I am finished, they are still going to give a hell of a run for my money.
I had a budget, blew by it, and then just decided to keep going until I got what I wanted. What I want is not a High HP FB, I wanted a High HP ROTARY TURBO FB.
It's not what it costs, it's what you're willing to spend.