1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

timing spread ????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-02 | 10:14 AM
  #1  
crankit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Vermont
timing spread ????

Just curious on what peoplep run for a timing spread between the trailing and lead plugs. Also any mods that required a change from stock.
Old 05-27-02 | 10:19 AM
  #2  
damon's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
From: valdosta,ga
check out paul yaw's site at http://personal.riverusers.com/~yawpower/
and look up his pages on timing very informative (he knows a lot about our cars )

Peace
Old 05-27-02 | 11:19 AM
  #3  
crankit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Vermont
Seen Yaws pages on timing just want to know what people run and if different form stocK why?
Old 05-27-02 | 11:33 AM
  #4  
damon's Avatar
Rotary Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
From: valdosta,ga
it al depends on your mods , driving , altitude , grade of fuel .

most people that Ive heard from use trial and error (between 10 and 26 degrees both leading and trailing ) our cars all started out the same but have differnt amount of wear on all the members makes them all different , things that do good on one car could be devastating to anothers performance

peace
Old 05-27-02 | 09:34 PM
  #5  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,635
Likes: 464
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Best power: Zero split (bad for emissions)

Best emissions: Factory (emissions is Mazda's primary concern with tuning)

Note that it's generally a Bad Thing for the trailing to fire ahead of the leading at heavy throttle, so you'd be good to put a little split in to be safe. I run 10 degrees of split, for a safety factor because I have an MSD on the leading side. (Just in case the first couple sparks from the MSD don't light it off...)
Old 05-27-02 | 09:55 PM
  #6  
82streetracer's Avatar
8/1 Building/Drive Ratio
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 1
From: Orono, MN
you can have them fire at the same time?

that sounds like it would make good power.
also it would let you run direct fire on the trailing

I want to run direct on the trailing so that I can rid myself of the dizzy and run 4 coil (wouldn't it look tight to run 2 MSDs and 4 coils, then just have a cover for the dizzy)
Old 05-27-02 | 10:46 PM
  #7  
4ohfour's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
From: Okotoks, AB, Canada
how do you run zero split timing? Would that be both plugs firing at the same time?

cheers'
Old 05-28-02 | 01:01 AM
  #8  
REVHED's Avatar
Hunting Skylines
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,431
Likes: 4
From: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Originally posted by 82streetracer
you can have them fire at the same time?

that sounds like it would make good power.
also it would let you run direct fire on the trailing

I want to run direct on the trailing so that I can rid myself of the dizzy and run 4 coil (wouldn't it look tight to run 2 MSDs and 4 coils, then just have a cover for the dizzy)
I don't think having a 0* split will make any difference... you still won't be able to run direct fire on the trailing as the wasted spark will still be firing into the incoming mixture. This is due to the position of the plug in the rotor housing.
Old 05-28-02 | 10:46 AM
  #9  
82streetracer's Avatar
8/1 Building/Drive Ratio
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 1
From: Orono, MN
Yeh I was looking at it yesterday.

I had a idea though. so you could run direct and msd on the trailing.

YOu would need 2 msds, 4 coil packs and a crank trigger setup. you could run two crank triggers.

one for the front rotor and one for the rear.
then just run a msd of each trigger and 2 coils of of the msd and those coils to each rotor.

with this you have zero split, Direct fire with multiple spark on both the leading and trailing and you can get rid of the distributor completely. the only other thing you would have to do is wire the tach off of one of the msd boxes.

What do you think.
Old 05-28-02 | 10:48 AM
  #10  
82streetracer's Avatar
8/1 Building/Drive Ratio
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 1
From: Orono, MN
with multiple sparks on both the leading and trailing the emmissions difference would be negligable.
Old 05-28-02 | 11:25 AM
  #11  
DriveFast7's Avatar
Blood, Sweat and Rotors
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 1
From: California
the shop that built my 12a sp, and many ppl i've talked to, say 8 degrees split leading-> trailing.

BradP
Old 05-29-02 | 10:05 AM
  #12  
82streetracer's Avatar
8/1 Building/Drive Ratio
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,397
Likes: 1
From: Orono, MN
so what would be the best timing. 0 degree tdc on leading and 7-8 atdc for trailing.
Old 05-29-02 | 12:59 PM
  #13  
crankit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Vermont
4 degree btdc lead and 4 degree atdc trail that should put your totals at 24 btdc lead@4000 and 16 btdc trail@4000
Old 05-29-02 | 01:08 PM
  #14  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,635
Likes: 464
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Always measure your timing at maximum advance (over 4000rpm). Some distributors have less advance than others. The RPM range below 4000 is unimportant so why should you care where the timing is down there?

I had problems running at 24/16, that's why I was running 20/10. I don't know where that was at idle, I never bothered to see where idle timing would up

I'm working on modifying a distributor so that each pickup has its own rotor. It'll be tricky to get it to fit right but it's doable. Then, each ignitor will drive a two-post coil which will fire L&T at the same time. (This means no waste spark on leading... oh well) No wires to the distributor cap at all.
Old 05-29-02 | 03:19 PM
  #15  
crankit's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Vermont
I just said 4000 cause it sounded right . Really its the max advance wasn't looking at the rpm.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stickmantijuana
Microtech
30
04-23-16 06:37 PM
incubuseva
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
14
09-03-15 12:37 PM
mazdaverx713b
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
19
08-29-15 12:30 PM
djritz
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
2
08-25-15 02:46 PM



Quick Reply: timing spread ????



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25 PM.