1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

Surge Tank set up

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-09-08 | 08:42 PM
  #1  
jcfrx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Port Saint Lucie
Surge Tank set up

Will this set up work on my 13BT.
Attached Thumbnails Surge Tank set up-fuel.jpg  
Old 07-09-08 | 10:03 PM
  #2  
elwood's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 25
From: https://t.me/pump_upp
That's a definite maybe. The routing is OK. You'll need to verify your flow ratings. Read the thread on my in-tank setup, it'll take you through that part.
Old 07-09-08 | 10:10 PM
  #3  
Siraniko's Avatar
RX for fun
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,926
Likes: 22
From: Socal
thats the route that most old school are taking. thats what we have in the turbo duece (sold) and 3-rotor RX-3 SP. that will ensure that you dont starve. In tank is not always the best
Old 07-09-08 | 11:45 PM
  #4  
PercentSevenC's Avatar
I need a new user title

 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,646
Likes: 1
From: Yaizu, Japan
Should be okay as long as the -SE pump flows enough. It probably does.
Old 07-10-08 | 06:24 AM
  #5  
jcfrx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Port Saint Lucie
Thanks for the inputs. Correct me if Iam wrong I think that the SE pump flows at 30GPH. + some of the Walboro pump return is going back to the surge tank...so I think that would help keep it full.
Old 07-10-08 | 10:47 AM
  #6  
trochoid's Avatar
Old Fart Young at Heart
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,145
Likes: 7
From: St Joe MO
Should work fine, what size is your sump tank, (needs to be 1 litre+)? Not sure where you found the flow rate for the SE pump, but it's my understanding that it outflows the Walbro, or at least the stock TII pump, but at a slightly lower psi.

Your drawing needs a little work. The line from the man tank to the SE pump should be no longer than stock and the return line from the surge tank to the main tank should be no lower than 1" from the top of the surge tank. If you mount the surge tnk under the body in the horizontal position, the return line can come out of the top of the surge tank. The feed for the Walbro should be at the bottom rearward end of the surge tank.
Old 07-10-08 | 04:24 PM
  #7  
jcfrx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Port Saint Lucie
^
very nice thanks.
Old 07-10-08 | 04:53 PM
  #8  
Hyper4mance2k's Avatar
The Shadetree Project
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,301
Likes: 3
From: District of Columbia
IIRC SE pump is 60psi @ 135lph
Old 07-10-08 | 06:48 PM
  #9  
elwood's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 25
From: https://t.me/pump_upp
The flow rate of the 'SE pump at 60psi doesn't matter. You need to know what it is at 0 psi (free flow). It will be a lot higher. The best way to be sure is to run the pump so it flows a known volume and time it. The manufacturer's specs for these things are hard to find and probably not very accurate because of all the variables involved -- especially voltage at your pump. Once you know the free flow rate, you need to calculate your fuel consumption at WOT. If your free flow is greater than or equal to your fuel consumption at WOT, you're OK.
Old 07-10-08 | 10:17 PM
  #10  
Siraniko's Avatar
RX for fun
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,926
Likes: 22
From: Socal
SE pump is more than enough. you can even use a non-FI pump to feed the surge tank since its just a short run
Old 07-10-08 | 11:11 PM
  #11  
elwood's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 25
From: https://t.me/pump_upp
I agree that a non-FI pump would be a good selection -- something that is designed more for flow than pressure. But I would definitely check the flow rate of that -SE pump based on expected HP. I don't think it would flow enough for my application, for example.

Hell, I'll do the calcs for you -- how much HP do you plan to make, jcfrx7?
Old 07-11-08 | 01:29 AM
  #12  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 83
From: Near Seattle
A Carter would make an excellent choice for feeding a surge tank. They do actually fit under a first gen.
Old 07-11-08 | 09:10 AM
  #13  
jcfrx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Port Saint Lucie
Originally Posted by elwood
I agree that a non-FI pump would be a good selection -- something that is designed more for flow than pressure. But I would definitely check the flow rate of that -SE pump based on expected HP. I don't think it would flow enough for my application, for example.

Hell, I'll do the calcs for you -- how much HP do you plan to make, jcfrx7?

Taking it to the dyno in a couple of weeks and Iam hoping it makes 300HP
Old 07-11-08 | 09:15 AM
  #14  
jcfrx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Port Saint Lucie
Originally Posted by trochoid
Should work fine, what size is your sump tank, (needs to be 1 litre+)? Not sure where you found the flow rate for the SE pump, but it's my understanding that it outflows the Walbro, or at least the stock TII pump, but at a slightly lower psi.

Your drawing needs a little work. The line from the man tank to the SE pump should be no longer than stock and the return line from the surge tank to the main tank should be no lower than 1" from the top of the surge tank. If you mount the surge tnk under the body in the horizontal position, the return line can come out of the top of the surge tank. The feed for the Walbro should be at the bottom rearward end of the surge tank.
So the goal here is keep the pums lower than the tanks. Cause I was going to mount the serge tank in the hatch. That makes it higher than the main tank and keep the pumps low by the main tank. Or can I put the pups high by the serge tank in the hatch.
Old 07-11-08 | 09:16 AM
  #15  
jcfrx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Port Saint Lucie
I will take a couple of pictures for a better view.
Old 07-11-08 | 09:50 AM
  #16  
elwood's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 25
From: https://t.me/pump_upp
You say 300HP -- I'll assume that's rear wheel HP or RWHP. Drivetrain losses will be approx 15%, so your flywheel HP will be 345.

HP X BSFC = Fuel Consumption
(345 HP) (.70 Lb/HP-Hr) = 242 Lb/Hr
Gasoline density = 1.621 Lb/L
Fuel consumption = 149 L/Hr

So your -SE pump must deliver 149 L/Hr at free flow to keep up if you're making 300 RWHP.

If you're making 300 Flywheel HP, the pump will need to supply 130 L/Hr.

Now take that pump and test it. Take it from a guy who's popped a motor. Set up the outlet of the pump so it empties into a 5 gallon bucket. Turn the pump on and time how long it takes the pump to fill up the bucket. This will give you the free flow rating. It doesn't take long, but it will avoid a big potential problem.
Old 07-11-08 | 09:54 AM
  #17  
elwood's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 25
From: https://t.me/pump_upp
Originally Posted by jcfrx7
So the goal here is keep the pums lower than the tanks. Cause I was going to mount the serge tank in the hatch. That makes it higher than the main tank and keep the pumps low by the main tank. Or can I put the pups high by the serge tank in the hatch.

I wouldn't mount anything that holds fuel inside the car. This topic has been kicked around on many forums many times, so I'm not trying to recreate that discussion -- do a search. But I like to have metal between me and gasoline.
Old 07-11-08 | 10:59 AM
  #18  
jcfrx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Port Saint Lucie
Originally Posted by elwood
I wouldn't mount anything that holds fuel inside the car. This topic has been kicked around on many forums many times, so I'm not trying to recreate that discussion -- do a search. But I like to have metal between me and gasoline.
Good point and I will reconsider and find a place outside the car. Safety first. Thanks.
Old 07-11-08 | 11:01 AM
  #19  
jcfrx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Port Saint Lucie
Originally Posted by elwood
You say 300HP -- I'll assume that's rear wheel HP or RWHP. Drivetrain losses will be approx 15%, so your flywheel HP will be 345.

HP X BSFC = Fuel Consumption
(345 HP) (.70 Lb/HP-Hr) = 242 Lb/Hr
Gasoline density = 1.621 Lb/L
Fuel consumption = 149 L/Hr

So your -SE pump must deliver 149 L/Hr at free flow to keep up if you're making 300 RWHP.

If you're making 300 Flywheel HP, the pump will need to supply 130 L/Hr.

Now take that pump and test it. Take it from a guy who's popped a motor. Set up the outlet of the pump so it empties into a 5 gallon bucket. Turn the pump on and time how long it takes the pump to fill up the bucket. This will give you the free flow rating. It doesn't take long, but it will avoid a big potential problem.


You are the man when it comes to fuel consumption. Thanks I will see how fast the pump pumps 5 gal.
Old 07-11-08 | 11:17 AM
  #20  
jcfrx7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Port Saint Lucie
Originally Posted by elwood
You say 300HP -- I'll assume that's rear wheel HP or RWHP. Drivetrain losses will be approx 15%, so your flywheel HP will be 345.

HP X BSFC = Fuel Consumption
(345 HP) (.70 Lb/HP-Hr) = 242 Lb/Hr
Gasoline density = 1.621 Lb/L
Fuel consumption = 149 L/Hr

So your -SE pump must deliver 149 L/Hr at free flow to keep up if you're making 300 RWHP.

If you're making 300 Flywheel HP, the pump will need to supply 130 L/Hr.

Now take that pump and test it. Take it from a guy who's popped a motor. Set up the outlet of the pump so it empties into a 5 gallon bucket. Turn the pump on and time how long it takes the pump to fill up the bucket. This will give you the free flow rating. It doesn't take long, but it will avoid a big potential problem.

Another question... So you are saying that the SE pump needs to pump out 5 gal in 8 min. to make about 35 GHR right?
Old 07-11-08 | 03:38 PM
  #21  
elwood's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 25
From: https://t.me/pump_upp
Yes, that's about right -- to be exact I came up with 7 min, 38 sec (for 300 RWHP):

149L/hr = 39.3 Gal/hr = 39.3 Gal/60 min = 5 Gal / 7.63 min
Old 07-11-08 | 06:02 PM
  #22  
Hyper4mance2k's Avatar
The Shadetree Project
iTrader: (40)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 7,301
Likes: 3
From: District of Columbia
sorry i ment that the stock SE pump can pump a maximum psi of 60 and max flow of 135lph. it was in some old book i have. from what I've heard they're good to just over 250whp after that you're pushing it... the walbro 255's are good to only 300whp. DSport did a really good fuel pump test about a year ago. you might want to try and find their test numbers.
Old 07-11-08 | 09:21 PM
  #23  
REVHED's Avatar
Hunting Skylines
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,431
Likes: 4
From: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
That's what I did except I used a Carter as the filler pump and Bosch as the main pump. There's enough room under the car to shoehorn it all in.

The SE pump should be ok as you'd have to be under full load for quite some time to suck the surge tank dry.

Attached Thumbnails Surge Tank set up-fuelsystem.jpg  
Old 07-11-08 | 11:53 PM
  #24  
elwood's Avatar
Rotary Freak
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,541
Likes: 25
From: https://t.me/pump_upp
Nice setup. The Carter and Bosch pumps come highly recommended.
Old 07-12-08 | 03:46 AM
  #25  
REVHED's Avatar
Hunting Skylines
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,431
Likes: 4
From: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Thanks. I have it set up a bit differently now with the Carter mounted vertically and away from the brake line.

The Bosch pumps are great. They're OE on Porches so they can't be too bad.


Quick Reply: Surge Tank set up



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 AM.