Info on Jesus Padilla 10sec rx7
#32
Originally posted by lost cause
How hard would it be to get a 2 rotor pushing atleast 300 horse?
How hard would it be to get a 2 rotor pushing atleast 300 horse?
300 RWHP would be pretty easy. In a streight line drag set up, he should be able to make right in the ballpark of 325-350, with a 13b. Lookin at about 300-325 with a 12a in full drag trim. All rotor of course.
CJG
#34
Originally posted by REVHED
Try flywheel hp.
Try flywheel hp.
CJG
#35
350rwhp? The most achieved from a twin rotor is about 370hp at the engine with slide throttle bodies. Obviously, not your run of the mill monster or p port.
But, then again you must know because you own one. (though it doesn't make that much power)
But, then again you must know because you own one. (though it doesn't make that much power)
#36
ya heheaha. It doesnt. But i said ""In a streight line drag set up, he should be able to make right in the ballpark of 325-350"". And you just said that about 370 has been made. So ??? whats the deal?? I said something, then you said no, then i said yes, then you said yes... Am i missing something?
I will say it once again. In a streight line drag set up, he should be able to make right in the ballpark of 325-350. And I am talking using a P port a predator carb. Also if i made the housings that would go with the set up it would make 350 in a streight line. Take one corner and the float bowl etc. is out of wack.
CJG
I will say it once again. In a streight line drag set up, he should be able to make right in the ballpark of 325-350. And I am talking using a P port a predator carb. Also if i made the housings that would go with the set up it would make 350 in a streight line. Take one corner and the float bowl etc. is out of wack.
CJG
#37
Amazing!!
If his 3 rotor setup is banned or not, its F'n amazing the times he's ran with no turbo or NOS....Most of us have a hard time running 11's & 12's with big turbo's and in my opinion if he's capable of doing what he has we surely haven't seen the last of him
Rock on Mr. Padilla
If his 3 rotor setup is banned or not, its F'n amazing the times he's ran with no turbo or NOS....Most of us have a hard time running 11's & 12's with big turbo's and in my opinion if he's capable of doing what he has we surely haven't seen the last of him
Rock on Mr. Padilla
#41
I just saw his car on Speed Vision the other day. They interviewd the Honda drivers and they were all saying he has an unfair advantage and stuff, lol. The had a lot of RX-7s on that show actually. It was that High Rev Tuners show or whatever.
~T.J.
~T.J.
#43
Originally posted by defprun
They would be 1.8 to 2.0 litre? And since the 3 rotor is 2.0 litres hes in the right league....only the others should be disqualified considering they have an advantage...they have 4 pistons while he only has 3 rotors!!! How unfair!
They would be 1.8 to 2.0 litre? And since the 3 rotor is 2.0 litres hes in the right league....only the others should be disqualified considering they have an advantage...they have 4 pistons while he only has 3 rotors!!! How unfair!
So a 2.0L 20b x 2.0 = 4.0 liter.
I will be racing in touring car club's 2.2l challenge and HAD to run a 12a. 1.1L 12ax 2.0 = 2.2L. I'll race Acura Integra 2.0L's, Type R's, 510's with L20B's, 90's Toyota Celicas, ...etc...
#45
Is this a pic of jesus old engine? or whos is this? Very nice, but im confused as to which carb set up that is. It appears to be a 40 IDA but those are too small and this one looks bigger. ??
CJG
CJG
Originally posted by CHEF_EG_1
So the 20B DOES fit...
hmmm
And I just saw one on ebay for 2500..................
So the 20B DOES fit...
hmmm
And I just saw one on ebay for 2500..................
#46
Weber did make 3bbl downdrafts, primarily for the porsche flat 6's, which is what it looks like Jesus is using.....
Mazdatrix had one for sale in early 90's, with side port manifold for 12a. . . . which I bought it . . .
Considering 51mm is the agreed upon minimum size for a 13b peripheral port, I'd guess it's along that size or probablly bigger since all drag needs is top end . . . .
Mazdatrix had one for sale in early 90's, with side port manifold for 12a. . . . which I bought it . . .
Considering 51mm is the agreed upon minimum size for a 13b peripheral port, I'd guess it's along that size or probablly bigger since all drag needs is top end . . . .
#47
Well lets see, the 787b made 700 NA horsepower out of a 26b in fuel-saving endurance trim. Half that is 350 for the 13b.... so in an all out, no holds barred drag engine, 350rwhp is WELL within possibilities
And as for the displacement, yea, the rotary does fire twice as often for the same displacement as a 4-stroke piston engine... so perhaps it should be classified as a 4.0L even though it is technically a 2L. Bah, bring in the 2 rotor and kill the competition anyways! hahaha
btw, that car is badass
And as for the displacement, yea, the rotary does fire twice as often for the same displacement as a 4-stroke piston engine... so perhaps it should be classified as a 4.0L even though it is technically a 2L. Bah, bring in the 2 rotor and kill the competition anyways! hahaha
btw, that car is badass
#49
Originally posted by Raptor13x
Well lets see, the 787b made 700 NA horsepower out of a 26b in fuel-saving endurance trim. Half that is 350 for the 13b.... so in an all out, no holds barred drag engine, 350rwhp is WELL within possibilities
Well lets see, the 787b made 700 NA horsepower out of a 26b in fuel-saving endurance trim. Half that is 350 for the 13b.... so in an all out, no holds barred drag engine, 350rwhp is WELL within possibilities
#50
no its not ... each of the rotors on a 26B should be putting out the same power. if you could build a 13b to the exact same spec as two 787B rotors it should make about half the power ... if not more as the ecentric shaft will be shorter and more rigid etc. etc.
Of course it woun't be 100% accurate but the results should be of the correct order.
Of course it woun't be 100% accurate but the results should be of the correct order.