1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

how is everyone lower'd here heated spring/cut ??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-22-04 | 10:18 PM
  #1  
Tree25is's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member

 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: LaCrescenta Ca/Fort Hood Tx
Wink how is everyone lower'd here heated spring/cut ??

=JUST KIDDING=
But seriously how is everyone lowerd here ????
since my car was only 100 bucks heating up the springs and droping it would hurt me to much but i know its the WRONG WAY TO GO. anyways how are you lowerd?
Old 01-22-04 | 10:22 PM
  #2  
Wankelguy's Avatar
My FSP Fiesta eats Jettas
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 3
Shorter, heavier springs.
Old 01-22-04 | 10:37 PM
  #3  
DriveFast7's Avatar
Blood, Sweat and Rotors
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 1
From: California
when i didn't know better i had my springs heated in my high school 82 Ford EXP. absolutely the WORST way to lower a car. heating makes the springs brittle and dangerous. plus they get very very bouncy.

but it was cheaper than cutting them. of course now i know to buy some shorter, stiffer springs. go Racing Beat if you want performance or Eibach Pro-Kit if you want it not as stiff.
Old 01-22-04 | 10:51 PM
  #4  
Tree25is's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member

 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: LaCrescenta Ca/Fort Hood Tx
your wheels on the rx-7 where did they come from , there sweet !
Old 01-22-04 | 11:15 PM
  #5  
DriveFast7's Avatar
Blood, Sweat and Rotors
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 1
From: California
http://diamondracingwheels.com/RoadRaceSeries.htm

13x8" BACKspace get the road race series, they have tighter tolerances

Last edited by DriveFast7; 01-22-04 at 11:17 PM.
Old 01-22-04 | 11:26 PM
  #6  
QuagmireMan's Avatar
Registered Offender

 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,047
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
i hate being lowed i cant drive anywhere without hearing a painful scrape
Old 01-22-04 | 11:46 PM
  #7  
Tree25is's Avatar
Thread Starter
Full Member

 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: LaCrescenta Ca/Fort Hood Tx
sweet thanks ! i love em low. my bimmer is really low so im used to low ****, the rx-7 is able to be low. its kinda durable compared to the alumium oil panned BMW!
Old 01-23-04 | 01:20 AM
  #8  
onepointone's Avatar
i say what i want
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 0
From: richmond, va
Originally posted by Tree25is
sweet thanks ! i love em low. my bimmer is really low so im used to low ****, the rx-7 is able to be low. its kinda durable compared to the alumium oil panned BMW!

my friend has a lowered bimmer as well, and he has that same problem. we were going through a burger king parking lot in his e30, and there was this nasty scrape, all his 2 day old oil went all over the parking lot. sucked at the time, but was funny afterwards.. atleast to me

DriveFast7 - what did you do to your racecar? i know those arent eibachs or racing beat springs, unless they have been cut. do you have the racing beat lowering kit?
Old 01-23-04 | 09:28 AM
  #9  
Rx7carl's Avatar
Airflow is my life
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,736
Likes: 2
From: Orlando, Fl
Originally posted by DriveFast7
when i didn't know better i had my springs heated in my high school 82 Ford EXP. absolutely the WORST way to lower a car. heating makes the springs brittle and dangerous. plus they get very very bouncy.

but it was cheaper than cutting them. of course now i know to buy some shorter, stiffer springs. go Racing Beat if you want performance or Eibach Pro-Kit if you want it not as stiff.
I thought Eibachs were stiffer than RB's?

For a soft street ride, Suspension Techniques are progressive in the front and softer than Eibachs or RB's. They lower about 1" or so.
Old 01-23-04 | 09:44 AM
  #10  
vipernicus42's Avatar
Rotoholic Moderookie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 5,962
Likes: 33
From: Ottawa, Soviet Canuckistan
I wasn't aiming to get lowered, but the RB springs are like .8" lower than stock. I probably won't notice a difference when I put them in because my old springs were so shot that they were pretty damn low!

But yeah, the safest, smartest and funnest way to lower is to get performance springs. That way you lower your car and instead of losing performance to look good, you gain it!

Jon

PS: I actually don't think lowering looks much better most of the time... but huge honkin' wheel well gaps don't look the best either... I'll post pics in the spring when my RB Springs and KYB shocks are in
Old 01-23-04 | 10:12 AM
  #11  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,637
Likes: 466
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
My car is "lowered" by having the original springs.

Mazda used the same springs for all 1st-gens. Look at the old ads and magazine pictures and notice where the wheel center was in relation to the rocker panels in the '79. Then look at them in '81, in '84, on the GSL-SE... you will notice a pattern. Every year, every time the car got heavier, the car'd get lower. Because Mazda used the same springs and rates, even though a fully loaded GSL-SE weighs lots more than a strippo '79. Even the later GSLs were weighed down like the GSL-SEs because most of the weight difference between the GSL and GSL-SE was in the brakes and wheels, which are of course unsprung weight and so don't affect ride height. (My GSL has A/C and P/S as well as sound deadener/insulation everywhere you look, and it sits *low*)

Now. Add 20 years of aging on the springs, and the cars sit even *lower*.

Most lowering springs actually raise the car, because the ride height difference is as compared to a new car, and who has a new 1st-gen? (Nobody!) This is good though, because the suspension geometry isn't that great at stock ('79) ride height and it only gets worse as you go lower.

I am working on fabricating some spring spacers to raise my car up. (1, 2, or 3 inches from where it is now, still pondering on the best way to go about it) Suspension travel is important, sop is good geometry. Certainly more important than getting the CG slightly lower!
Old 01-23-04 | 01:03 PM
  #12  
Wankelguy's Avatar
My FSP Fiesta eats Jettas
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 3
Why you trend-bucking heretic!

I like that...
Old 01-23-04 | 03:28 PM
  #13  
DriveFast7's Avatar
Blood, Sweat and Rotors
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,742
Likes: 1
From: California
Eibach Pro-Kit front springs are progressive. cushier than RB on flat roads, start to stiffen up once compression starts
Old 01-23-04 | 03:42 PM
  #14  
purple82's Avatar
Absolute Power is Awesome
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,972
Likes: 5
From: Issaquah, WA
Originally posted by peejay
My car is "lowered" by having the original springs.

Mazda used the same springs for all 1st-gens. Look at the old ads and magazine pictures and notice where the wheel center was in relation to the rocker panels in the '79. Then look at them in '81, in '84, on the GSL-SE... you will notice a pattern. Every year, every time the car got heavier, the car'd get lower. Because Mazda used the same springs and rates, even though a fully loaded GSL-SE weighs lots more than a strippo '79. Even the later GSLs were weighed down like the GSL-SEs because most of the weight difference between the GSL and GSL-SE was in the brakes and wheels, which are of course unsprung weight and so don't affect ride height. (My GSL has A/C and P/S as well as sound deadener/insulation everywhere you look, and it sits *low*)
Actually SAs had stiffer, taller springs than FBs. They have different part numbers.
Old 01-24-04 | 12:51 AM
  #15  
1984se's Avatar
Ryan
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,534
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, Ca 323/213/818/626
https://www.rx7club.com/attachment.p...postid=2167502
Old 01-24-04 | 01:11 AM
  #16  
BIG J MIXALOT's Avatar
SHSHSHA POCKET SAND
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
From: Monroe Wa
is it better to cut or heat up the springs
Old 01-24-04 | 01:23 AM
  #17  
RotorMotorDriver's Avatar
Seven Is Coming
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,503
Likes: 3
From: Washington
my friend has a lowered bimmer as well, and he has that same problem. we were going through a burger king parking lot in his e30, and there was this nasty scrape, all his 2 day old oil went all over the parking lot. sucked at the time, but was funny afterwards.. atleast to me
That happened to me at work one time!! I was pulling a lowered tricked out E30 M3 into the washing bay and theres a little mini speed bump type thing at the entrance as to keep the water inside the garage bay thingy so it goes down the drain and not all over the lot. Anyway, I was pulling it in, and the suspension was really stiff and really low, so right as it dropped over that bump, it bounced once really hard and the next thing I knew when I got out I was standing in a pool of oil. Luckily the parts department had a couplde oil pans in stock, and they just wrote it off, but it sucked, lol.

~T.J.
Old 01-24-04 | 02:33 AM
  #18  
onepointone's Avatar
i say what i want
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 0
From: richmond, va
Originally posted by RotorMotorDriver
....E30 M3...

im sorry... what?
Old 01-24-04 | 02:54 AM
  #19  
mazdaverx713b's Avatar
Have RX-7, will restore
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 21,913
Likes: 1,101
From: Ohio
heated springs, ugh!!!!! get a set of eibach's. works well!
Old 01-24-04 | 02:59 AM
  #20  
Jon_Valjean's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 478
Likes: 43
From: Napier
Don't know about you guys, but heated/chopped springs are illegal here. Can't beat a good set of King's or Jamex springs to drop it down a coupla inches
Old 01-24-04 | 03:09 PM
  #21  
peejay's Avatar
Old [Sch|F]ool
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,637
Likes: 466
From: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Originally posted by purple82
Actually SAs had stiffer, taller springs than FBs. They have different part numbers.
Care to elaborate? I'd love to see free lengths/spring rates.

AFAIK the only different springs are that RHD cars have a right front spring .5" longer than the left, whereas LHD cars have a left front spring .5" longer than the right.
Old 01-24-04 | 03:14 PM
  #22  
FD Racer's Avatar
sold the FD...kept the FB
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 1
From: Torrance, CA
coilover setup with 2.5" eibach 350lb. springs, along with racing beat's lowering kit in the front. In the rear I eliminated the watts link and did a trilink setup from G-force with a panhard bar and 250lb. short springs

Old 01-24-04 | 03:17 PM
  #23  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Lapping = Fapping
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 83
From: Near Seattle
Before they had slightly longer springs on one side, they had a .5" spacer on the driver's side. My Cosmo has one.
Old 02-15-04 | 07:36 PM
  #24  
onepointone's Avatar
i say what i want
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 0
From: richmond, va
Originally posted by FD Racer
coilover setup with 2.5" eibach 350lb. springs, along with racing beat's lowering kit in the front. In the rear I eliminated the watts link and did a trilink setup from G-force with a panhard bar and 250lb. short springs

where did you get those springs?



granted the car is still in the air, and has been in the air for a long time, but for the picture i jacked the car off the stands by the rear diff (i dont have lugs for the wheels yet, so i cant put it on the ground). im not liking that wheel gap at all. i have eibach springs on my other car, but they are the pro-kit and i dont know if it will do the trick. i plan to do ground controll coil overs in the front, but what about the rear? i dont want it up like that.
Old 02-15-04 | 08:12 PM
  #25  
MosesX605's Avatar
My wife bought me 2 RX-7s
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,328
Likes: 3
From: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
Check out these springs from mazdatrix:

http://www.mazdatrix.com/getprice.as...ACESPRING-1R-2

They are 175 pounds/inch and have several dead wound coils so you can cut without affecting the rate. That should give you the height you want, but the rear end will be STIFF.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 PM.