1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

GSL-SE OMP flow rate question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-04-06 | 01:24 PM
  #1  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lapping = Fapping
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 83
From: Near Seattle
GSL-SE OMP flow rate question

Does anyone know the flow rate of a GSL-SE OMP compared to a 12A OMP, and whether all four lines flow the same? Thanks.
Old 05-04-06 | 01:38 PM
  #2  
Siraniko's Avatar
RX for fun
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,926
Likes: 22
From: Socal
Good question. I never measured it but I know its more than 12-A. Im using SE OMP's wherein I reduced the lines to 2 using a "tee-wye" (also known as "tee" or a "wye").
Old 05-04-06 | 01:46 PM
  #3  
trochoid's Avatar
Old Fart Young at Heart
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,145
Likes: 7
From: St Joe MO
The 85 FSM shows the test for the 12A, which measures total output of the mop, it makes no mention of testing the 13B. My assumption would be that the output rate would be similiar between the 2 mops, the only difference being the 13B is split into 4 lines and lubes more effectively. With that in mind, I would think the 13B would mop would put out less.

However, to totally confuse things, the 87 FSM test shows removing 2 lines, running the engine for 5 minutes, as opposed to 6 and the output should be 4.2-5.6 cc for the non-turbo and 5.2-6.6 cc for the turbo. When comparing the 12A to the 13BT, the later engine has approximately 6 times more mop output.

Interesting question Jeff, I don't have an answer for that one.
Old 05-04-06 | 05:12 PM
  #4  
Rotor13B's Avatar
Wassup!!
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 1
From: Longmont Co.
12A, 2.0-2.5 cc's every 6 minutes @2000 rpms unless 84' or newer then it's 1.8-2.2cc's , 13B, 0.8-1.8cc's every 6 minutes @2000 rpms.
Old 05-05-06 | 12:50 PM
  #5  
Jeff20B's Avatar
Thread Starter
Lapping = Fapping
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,725
Likes: 83
From: Near Seattle
Thanks guys. I had originally considered using a 12A front cover because they're more common and simply adding a T or Y fitting to each line, but figured the oil would follow the path of least reistance. Not a good idea.

I figured the GSL-SE unit, with its four fittings at the source, would be a better idea. But then there's the lower flow rate...

I wonder if I could compensate for the lower flow rate by adding a couple extra washers under the lever.
Old 05-05-06 | 01:46 PM
  #6  
trochoid's Avatar
Old Fart Young at Heart
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,145
Likes: 7
From: St Joe MO
Washers would work, so would a little pre-mix if you want to mess with that.
Old 05-05-06 | 01:57 PM
  #7  
Siraniko's Avatar
RX for fun
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,926
Likes: 22
From: Socal
Originally Posted by Jeff20B
Thanks guys. I had originally considered using a 12A front cover because they're more common and simply adding a T or Y fitting to each line, but figured the oil would follow the path of least reistance. Not a good idea.

I figured the GSL-SE unit, with its four fittings at the source, would be a better idea. But then there's the lower flow rate...

I wonder if I could compensate for the lower flow rate by adding a couple extra washers under the lever.

That depends. For all carb set up, less smoke without the extra oil line @ housing.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rotor_veux
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
5
09-03-15 07:10 PM



Quick Reply: GSL-SE OMP flow rate question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:18 PM.