1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

FB vs. Oldsmobile

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-18-04, 07:43 PM
  #1  
Last of the Mohicans

Thread Starter
 
FrEaK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Coronado, CA
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FB vs. Oldsmobile

so how would my 81 12A FB fair againt my friend's Oldmobile Intrigue, 2.8 Liter 6 cylinder engine, oh its automatic as well?
Old 05-18-04, 07:47 PM
  #2  
Senior Member

 
CARLiTO_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Toronto
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fb should take it, olds are heavy
Old 05-18-04, 07:50 PM
  #3  
It Runs!

 
Anex 570's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Be sure you launch good, and you'll pull alot on him. Hit about 4k rpm and redline, shift, redline, and shift. I doubt he'll be near you once your at the end of 3rd becuase you could hit damn well near 80 at the end.
Old 05-18-04, 07:51 PM
  #4  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,544
Received 427 Likes on 306 Posts
Intrigues are not 2.8l. IIRC they use the 3.5l "Shortstar". (That or the 3.4l, but either way the last 2.8 was made *ages* ago)

Basically, prepare to be owned. I've seen them run at the strip, and unless your car is Not Stock and/or well tuned (tuning includes driver) then... well, sucks.
Old 05-18-04, 08:18 PM
  #5  
Last of the Mohicans

Thread Starter
 
FrEaK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Coronado, CA
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oops just double checked the olds engine is a 3.7 liter
Old 05-18-04, 09:09 PM
  #6  
Have RX-7, will restore


iTrader: (91)
 
mazdaverx713b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,754
Received 1,062 Likes on 899 Posts
you will not win being stock. i have been owned by buicks and newer VW's. oh well, thats the name of hte game when you drive a stock 24 year old car. i don't car, i took a new ION and felt good about myself
Old 05-18-04, 09:15 PM
  #7  
Royale with cheese

 
Tanjo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Las Vegas, by way of Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just say what I say when I lose.



"Id out handle you."
Old 05-18-04, 09:35 PM
  #8  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,544
Received 427 Likes on 306 Posts
Originally posted by Tanjo
Just say what I say when I lose.



"Id out handle you."
Except, you probably wouldn't.
Old 05-18-04, 11:42 PM
  #9  
Are you gonna shift?!

 
AdrenalifeRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why do you have to even race? Sounds dumb to me.
Old 05-19-04, 09:12 AM
  #10  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Winnipeg MB
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if your quick...and g=have good reflexes you can beat him for a while...enough to maybe make him make a mistake...then he is yours...I have beat a few 5.0L mustangs bu being faster off the light...making them nervous and having them grab 5th instead of 3rd. just dont accept a re match if that happens.
Old 05-19-04, 09:44 AM
  #11  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: KY
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hard to make a mistake in an autotragic.
Old 05-19-04, 09:53 AM
  #12  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: KY
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Did you mean 3.8L? That WAS an option for the olds. umm...I believe these are the numbers for the 3.5L

0-60 is around 7.8 and 1/4 mile are around 15.9.

around 215-220 hp and 230ft/lbs of torque.

Even Domestic family sedans aren't crippling slow anymore. I would have a challenge beating that with my Maxima.
Old 05-19-04, 07:40 PM
  #13  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,544
Received 427 Likes on 306 Posts
Many minivans/SUVs can run low 16's/high 15's.

200hp is so common it's considered low anymore.
Old 05-19-04, 08:10 PM
  #14  
love the braaaap

 
85rotarypower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bognor, Ontario
Posts: 3,771
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
That is so true peejay. The intrigue has a 3.4L pushrod engine. About 180hp. I don't know if the 3.8L engine was available, but you would get owned big time if it has the 3.8. It has about 210hp and 240 ft lbs of torque (or something like that) in a 3100 lbs car. Unless your making some more power than stock, you would get owned so badly. I can tell you this much, my dad has an Intrepid with a 3.2L engine. It has only 220 hp and it goes like a bat outa hell. It weighs in at 3600 lbs too, and hits its 120 mph limiter in no time at all. Probably could easily hit 150 mph if it didn't have a limiter.
Old 05-20-04, 10:36 AM
  #15  
I'm old but not slow

 
Brianhsval's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Huntsville,Al
Posts: 777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I got faith in the first gen. With just a few mods I ran a 300M and it was dead even in the 1/4. More mods and I got him. I can out run him till I hit 5th gear, but then he hits his limiter at 117 and I'm gone.
Old 05-20-04, 10:56 AM
  #16  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: KY
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what are the specs of your car?

300M

0-to-60-mph acceleration, sec. 7.8
Quarter-mile acceleration, sec. 15.9
Quarter-mile speed, mph 87.0
60-to-0-mph braking, feet 118
600-ft slalom, mph 63.6


The one thing that sticks out on the 300M for me is 60-0 braking.

Now, this is the FWD model.

You won't be able to touch the new RWD one.

Last edited by Rutnick; 05-20-04 at 11:01 AM.
Old 05-20-04, 11:23 AM
  #17  
love the braaaap

 
85rotarypower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bognor, Ontario
Posts: 3,771
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
The new 300 isn't a 300M. Its a totally different car, but thats true. A 1st gen wouldn't be able to come close to a new 300C. The 300 on the other hand is not nearly as fast. It only has the 3.5L engine, where as the 300C has the Hemi.

BTW, don't forget that the 300M weighs in at over 3800 lbs too.
Old 05-20-04, 12:36 PM
  #18  
Senior Member

 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: KY
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, 300C would smoke a 1st gen (and a bunch of other cars)

The 300M shows a curb weight of around 3600lbs. 3.5l with 250 hp. I posted the 0-60 and 1/4 mile times for a 300M.

7.8 and 15.9
Old 05-20-04, 06:53 PM
  #19  
Last of the Mohicans

Thread Starter
 
FrEaK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Coronado, CA
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
damn my friend is a real *******, just wanted to make him be quiet, if only for a little bit. Oh well his car almost cost 4 times as much as mine.
Old 05-20-04, 06:58 PM
  #20  
Old [Sch|F]ool

 
peejay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Posts: 12,544
Received 427 Likes on 306 Posts
Originally posted by FrEaK
damn my friend is a real *******, just wanted to make him be quiet, if only for a little bit. Oh well his car almost cost 4 times as much as mine.
The correct response is "so what?"

The trick is, you have to *mean* it.

Traditionally, sports cars have never been very quick, and could often be outaccelerated, outbraked, and even outcornered by contemporary sedans. That's not the point. The point is having fun.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rgordon1979
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
40
03-15-22 12:04 PM
alfred1976
1st Gen General Discussion
6
10-01-17 09:51 PM
GKW
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
5
09-28-15 04:34 PM
pd_day
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
7
07-01-02 10:35 AM
BlackRex
Rotary Car Performance
8
06-10-02 12:31 AM



Quick Reply: FB vs. Oldsmobile



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44 AM.