1st Generation Specific (1979-1985) 1979-1985 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections

DLIDFIS with FC coil

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-03-07, 09:09 AM
  #1  
Have RX-7, will restore


Thread Starter
iTrader: (91)
 
mazdaverx713b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,750
Received 1,062 Likes on 899 Posts
DLIDFIS with FC coil

getting ready to go with the dlidfis setup on my 85 S and i have a question about using an FC coil. by using this, it will eliminate the need for thw two FB coils and the ignitor, as the FC trailing coil pack that i am considering using has the ignitor built in and is mounted on a heat sink. seems like it would work just fine in theory, as this coil pack fires at the same time. i'm just in need of some opinions before i attempt this. should i just stick with the FB coils and the seperate ignitor? or would this be a good upgrade?
Old 07-03-07, 09:24 AM
  #2  
GOT WANKEL?

 
kgray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
just do the 2nd gen direct fire mod, then there is no need for another ignitor.
Old 07-03-07, 09:27 AM
  #3  
Have RX-7, will restore


Thread Starter
iTrader: (91)
 
mazdaverx713b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,750
Received 1,062 Likes on 899 Posts
using the leading coil instead of the trailing coil?? and/or using my existing ignitor instead of using the FC ignitor?i liked the FC's trailing coil pack due to its size and having the ignitor built onto it.
Old 07-03-07, 09:29 AM
  #4  
GOT WANKEL?

 
kgray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
you got both right!
Old 07-03-07, 09:29 AM
  #5  
GOT WANKEL?

 
kgray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
i did it and noticed a nice improvement (i have 6al too)
Old 07-03-07, 09:33 AM
  #6  
Have RX-7, will restore


Thread Starter
iTrader: (91)
 
mazdaverx713b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,750
Received 1,062 Likes on 899 Posts
excellent! i've been wanting to do this for quite some time now. i have the smaller FC coil with the built in ignitor and it looks as if it will work pretty well. i'm excited to try this.
Old 07-03-07, 09:39 AM
  #7  
GOT WANKEL?

 
kgray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
bypass the igniter, but keep the ballast. if you don't understand what i'm saying i can take some pics.

edit: here you go
https://www.rx7club.com/showpost.php...65&postcount=9
Old 07-03-07, 09:43 AM
  #8  
Have RX-7, will restore


Thread Starter
iTrader: (91)
 
mazdaverx713b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,750
Received 1,062 Likes on 899 Posts
i do understand. i want to keep the ballast to prevent the ignitor from burning up. and i will not use the second gen ignitor, i will use my forst gen ignitor instead. i'm going to get some heat sink grease from radio shack today and i'm pretty sure i have all of the parts necessary.
Old 07-03-07, 09:45 AM
  #9  
GOT WANKEL?

 
kgray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
just make sure you use the ballast from the second gen coil and disconnect the + wire from the igniter and tape it off.
Old 07-03-07, 09:56 AM
  #10  
Have RX-7, will restore


Thread Starter
iTrader: (91)
 
mazdaverx713b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,750
Received 1,062 Likes on 899 Posts
yeah, that sounds good. this seems it will be a nice setup. thanks for the link!
Old 07-03-07, 09:59 AM
  #11  
Have RX-7, will restore


Thread Starter
iTrader: (91)
 
mazdaverx713b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,750
Received 1,062 Likes on 899 Posts
also, how much am i advancing the timing when going to this setup?
Old 07-03-07, 10:12 AM
  #12  
GOT WANKEL?

 
kgray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,324
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
to tell you the truth, i didnt mess with timing at all when i did mine, i should though. I think its going lean up top.
Best bet is to check it and go from there
Old 07-03-07, 10:16 AM
  #13  
Have RX-7, will restore


Thread Starter
iTrader: (91)
 
mazdaverx713b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,750
Received 1,062 Likes on 899 Posts
that works. i really dont like messing with the timing. it always seems like it messes things up and its hard to make it run correctly after jacking aroud with it. i may advance it SLIGHTLY. its hard to tell how much though, as i know you are very well aware of, the 7 doesnt have a timing indicator, just the leading mark(yellow) and trailing mark(orange) and the lovely pin. gotta love it!
Old 07-03-07, 09:09 PM
  #14  
Have RX-7, will restore


Thread Starter
iTrader: (91)
 
mazdaverx713b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ohio
Posts: 21,750
Received 1,062 Likes on 899 Posts
got it installed with EXCELLENT success!!!! very good idle, very smooth as well! here's a pic:



sorry about the poor quality, i took the pic with my cell phone. next will be the FC fuse block!!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RuffRx7
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
4
10-01-15 03:08 AM
GKW
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
5
09-28-15 04:34 PM
killerrx710
Adaptronic Engine Mgmt - AUS
5
09-28-15 09:13 AM
killerrx710
2nd Generation Specific (1986-1992)
1
09-24-15 10:57 PM



Quick Reply: DLIDFIS with FC coil



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:21 PM.