Design flaws.
#52
I don't know if its available in the states yet but they've had a CAT for the rx7 that eliminates the airpump for a few years now. I know for a fact that RE Amemiya sells them. They're good enough to pass emmission testing in Japan so I'm guessing that they're good enought to pass the test here in the States
#58
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
From: Shelburne,Ontario
Originally posted by 31rx7
A few to think about. Design flaws:
- Rear suspension as noted. The geometry issues cam be addressed through various means, but having 250 lbs of unsprung weight is a bit more difficult. IRS would be nice.
- The storage bin rust issue as noted on other threads. Inexcusable.
- Recirculating ball steering as noted. No easy permanent fix. I would be curious about the impact to geometry for CP Racing Rack and Pinion setup on lowered cars. Particularly as it relates to ackerman.
- Window regulators. The shaft for the crank goes bad because there is no bushing in the door panel.
- Fuel pump volume and pressure. On the 12a cars, it can't keep up at sustained high RPM or wide open throttle.
- On the 84-85 cars, the stereo surround. They all break!
- The rear hatch carpet, and much of the interior materials is poor quality. It starts fading after a few years.
- Outside door handle / latch design. You can break into most 1st gens by lifting the handle and inserting a screwdriver in the opening.
- The oil cooler design on the 83 - 85 cars. Tendency to leak and is generally not very effective.
- Storage bin hinges. They all go bad.
- Idler arm is weak, and the bushing disintegrates under heavy driving.
I am careful to differentiate between design flaws and weak points. For example, the foam in the seats and the visors crumbles, but I credit that to old technology...then again, maybe it was just cheap to begin with.
A few to think about. Design flaws:
- Rear suspension as noted. The geometry issues cam be addressed through various means, but having 250 lbs of unsprung weight is a bit more difficult. IRS would be nice.
- The storage bin rust issue as noted on other threads. Inexcusable.
- Recirculating ball steering as noted. No easy permanent fix. I would be curious about the impact to geometry for CP Racing Rack and Pinion setup on lowered cars. Particularly as it relates to ackerman.
- Window regulators. The shaft for the crank goes bad because there is no bushing in the door panel.
- Fuel pump volume and pressure. On the 12a cars, it can't keep up at sustained high RPM or wide open throttle.
- On the 84-85 cars, the stereo surround. They all break!
- The rear hatch carpet, and much of the interior materials is poor quality. It starts fading after a few years.
- Outside door handle / latch design. You can break into most 1st gens by lifting the handle and inserting a screwdriver in the opening.
- The oil cooler design on the 83 - 85 cars. Tendency to leak and is generally not very effective.
- Storage bin hinges. They all go bad.
- Idler arm is weak, and the bushing disintegrates under heavy driving.
I am careful to differentiate between design flaws and weak points. For example, the foam in the seats and the visors crumbles, but I credit that to old technology...then again, maybe it was just cheap to begin with.
#59
Thanks. I am certain the CP Racing rack and pinion conversion greatly improves the feel and responsiveness of the steering, which in and of itself assists in handling improvement. $500 or so is not a bad price for improving the "wonder steering" on the 1st gen.
However, I am interested to know what happens with the tie rod angles and ackerman, particularly with a lowered car.
I suppose if I was that interested, I would email or call them directly...
However, I am interested to know what happens with the tie rod angles and ackerman, particularly with a lowered car.
I suppose if I was that interested, I would email or call them directly...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turblown
Vendor Classifieds
12
10-17-20 04:25 PM
Snook
3rd Generation Specific (1993-2002)
23
09-30-15 12:36 PM