Bridgeports are the best!@#!@# I luv it!@#
#1
Senior Member
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/05_year_icon.png)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bridgeports are the best!@#!@# I luv it!@#
After lots of $$ and hair loss I have got my bridgy running just about perfecto. I had the jetts changed and the power valve blocked off and now it runs AWESOME!@# I actually have powerband that makes me feel like I could beat anything. anywayz I just wanted to share with ppl how good bridgeports are and rotarys once u get them running right. YES!@#!#
HEB.
HEB.
#3
Senior Member
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/05_year_icon.png)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and I should off edited the above post but for some reason the rotar was getting way too much fuel. I thought rotors loved fuel. Oh and my car originally had a 650 on it, which was so bad it couldn't be driven out of the driveway. And also is a 48ida only 326 cfm or sometin? thats ****!@#
#4
Hunting Skylines
![](https://www.rx7club.com/images/misc/15_year_icon.png)
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Posts: 3,431
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
The "rotors love fuel" thing is another one of those myths people throw around. The fact is, n/a rotors need quite a bit of fuel at idle and light load but at WOT they will make the most power at a/f ratios bordering on the lean side.
I'm not sure on the CFM of an 48IDA but I think the flow rates for two and four-barrel carbies are measured at different vacuum levels so you can't really compare the two.
I'm not sure on the CFM of an 48IDA but I think the flow rates for two and four-barrel carbies are measured at different vacuum levels so you can't really compare the two.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LongDuck
1st Generation Specific (1979-1985)
12
10-07-15 08:12 PM