1st gen top speed?
#29
Right near Malloy
iTrader: (28)
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 513
From: Behind a workbench, repairing FC Electronics.
Originally posted by Jerm982
Your average Civic tops out at about 127, though the speedo may be showing 140 or more.
Your average Civic tops out at about 127, though the speedo may be showing 140 or more.
I don't like having the boinger above 4.5K RPM too much.
#32
125 and solid as a rock. That is pre turbo of course.
If 1st gen guys want to go fast, they had better have ground effects. Too much turbulance.
If 1st gen guys want to go fast, they had better have ground effects. Too much turbulance.
I was very alert to the '85 GSL when I took her up to 130MPH. It takes a while but still was accerating. Mildport engine. I haven't had the guts to find out what the bridgeport will do yet. he he.
#34
The Rotorheaded Geek
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
From: exit 8 in Manchester, NH
damn your nuts, although come to think of it I have done some what the same thing in my dads Vette. He has modded the hell outta it. It does 130 in a heart beat, puts my 7 to shame, but he also has about 5 times as much hp. Oh yeah it was 125+ in a 30 heading for a 50. Wanted to see what she could do.
#35
Ha, funny this topic should come up. Got a call from my guitarist friend yesterday saying he needs someone to drive him up the coast to play a gig. He got asked to fill in for some band who was missing their guitarist.
Anyway, the drive home was about 1.5 hours of near straight two lane highway at 1AM with barely another car on the road. Perfect time for some top speed runs.
I took it up to redline in 5th gear with about 220kph showing on the speedo. I've done the calculations for my gearing (4.44 rear) and tyre size and the actual speed is about 230-240kph or 150mph. The reason the speedo was showing lower is because I have a ratio box to correct it but it's a bit inaccurate.
It pulled up to those speeds pretty easily and the car felt very stable so I don't know why some of you think the Seven's not suited to high speeds. Rice Racing's had his first gen up to 200mph.
Correction: I just did the math again and it's about 145mph.
Anyway, the drive home was about 1.5 hours of near straight two lane highway at 1AM with barely another car on the road. Perfect time for some top speed runs.
I took it up to redline in 5th gear with about 220kph showing on the speedo. I've done the calculations for my gearing (4.44 rear) and tyre size and the actual speed is about 230-240kph or 150mph. The reason the speedo was showing lower is because I have a ratio box to correct it but it's a bit inaccurate.
It pulled up to those speeds pretty easily and the car felt very stable so I don't know why some of you think the Seven's not suited to high speeds. Rice Racing's had his first gen up to 200mph.
Correction: I just did the math again and it's about 145mph.
Last edited by REVHED; 03-31-02 at 07:13 PM.
#37
it is possible
145+++ MPH
yes car was lowered big time about 2" of the ground. Panasports 13" with really low profile tires and a front air dam...tested plenty of times with other newer cars nexto to it. Car had about 180hp or so. without air dam car was very unstable and hit about 135 only.
yes car was lowered big time about 2" of the ground. Panasports 13" with really low profile tires and a front air dam...tested plenty of times with other newer cars nexto to it. Car had about 180hp or so. without air dam car was very unstable and hit about 135 only.
#38
Here's the formula for anyone who wants to work out their actual top speed as opposed to what the speedo says.
mph = (rpm x tire size) / (gear ratio x 336)
tire size = diameter of tire in inches
gear ratio = tranny gear ratio x diff ratio
336 is a conversion factor
BTW, the Haynes manual states that 5th gear is 0.825:1 Does anyone know exactly what year models that applies to?
mph = (rpm x tire size) / (gear ratio x 336)
tire size = diameter of tire in inches
gear ratio = tranny gear ratio x diff ratio
336 is a conversion factor
BTW, the Haynes manual states that 5th gear is 0.825:1 Does anyone know exactly what year models that applies to?
#39
Full Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Yarmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada
If anyone can hit 140 on the speedo, I'm impressed. I was going 130ish and that was basically red-lined (almost) in 5th. I didn't think it had any gears left after that. I kept expecting the buzzer to go off.
#41
Originally posted by REVHED
Rice Racing's had his first gen up to 200mph.
Rice Racing's had his first gen up to 200mph.
I belive Racing Beat took their HIGHLY MODIFIED
1st generation out on the Bonneville Salt Flats
(Where all high spped records are done)
and achived the grand total of 183.904 MPH
So... I don't believe you, and I don't think you should believe him either.
You sure you don't mean 200 KilometersPer Hour?
Last edited by Directfreak; 03-31-02 at 08:20 PM.
#42
Driven a turbo FB lately?
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,444
Likes: 0
From: Fort Branch, Indiana
Oh by the way when you want to see what Kp/h is in MPH just divide km / 1.6
By the way, isnt the record for an Fd around 250?
They probally have a highly modified 20B into a 1st gen chasis and everything is tuned 100% and not orginal...
I see it being possible..
By the way, isnt the record for an Fd around 250?
They probally have a highly modified 20B into a 1st gen chasis and everything is tuned 100% and not orginal...
I see it being possible..
Last edited by MIKE-P-28; 03-31-02 at 08:28 PM.
#43
Keep in mind RICE RACING's 1st-gen has a 500-590bhp turbo 13B in it and is modified for circuit racing
Directfreak you say you had low-pro tires on it... did you have the speedometer corrected afterwards? Also was the speedo accurate in the first place? (the '80 would register 70-75mph at a true 60mph, with stock size tires... basically I drove it off the tach and ignored the speedo)
Directfreak you say you had low-pro tires on it... did you have the speedometer corrected afterwards? Also was the speedo accurate in the first place? (the '80 would register 70-75mph at a true 60mph, with stock size tires... basically I drove it off the tach and ignored the speedo)
#44
Originally posted by Directfreak
Ahem.. *choke*..
I belive Racing Beat took their HIGHLY MODIFIED
1st generation out on the Bonneville Salt Flats
(Where all high spped records are done)
and achived the grand total of 183.904 MPH
So... I don't believe you, and I don't think you should believe him either.
You sure you don't mean 200 KilometersPer Hour?
Ahem.. *choke*..
I belive Racing Beat took their HIGHLY MODIFIED
1st generation out on the Bonneville Salt Flats
(Where all high spped records are done)
and achived the grand total of 183.904 MPH
So... I don't believe you, and I don't think you should believe him either.
You sure you don't mean 200 KilometersPer Hour?
And BTW, that RB land speed record was in 1978 you dim wit!!! It says so in big bold letters on the top of that picture you posted.
#46
BTW I have a stong feeling that that LSR car had a NON TURBO engine. There are specific classes for speed records, rigidly defined by displacement, body type, type of fuel, aspiration, and probably driver's blood type.
#47
Originally posted by peejay
Keep in mind RICE RACING's 1st-gen has a 500-590bhp turbo 13B in it and is modified for circuit racing
Keep in mind RICE RACING's 1st-gen has a 500-590bhp turbo 13B in it and is modified for circuit racing
Last edited by REVHED; 03-31-02 at 08:39 PM.
#48
Originally posted by mperformance
145+++ MPH
yes car was lowered big time about 2" of the ground. Panasports 13" with really low profile tires and a front air dam...tested plenty of times with other newer cars nexto to it. Car had about 180hp or so. without air dam car was very unstable and hit about 135 only.
145+++ MPH
yes car was lowered big time about 2" of the ground. Panasports 13" with really low profile tires and a front air dam...tested plenty of times with other newer cars nexto to it. Car had about 180hp or so. without air dam car was very unstable and hit about 135 only.
Originally posted by peejay
Directfreak you say you had low-pro tires on it... did you have the speedometer corrected afterwards? Also was the speedo accurate in the first place? (the '80 would register 70-75mph at a true 60mph, with stock size tires... basically I drove it off the tach and ignored the speedo)
Directfreak you say you had low-pro tires on it... did you have the speedometer corrected afterwards? Also was the speedo accurate in the first place? (the '80 would register 70-75mph at a true 60mph, with stock size tires... basically I drove it off the tach and ignored the speedo)
#49
Driven a turbo FB lately?
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,444
Likes: 0
From: Fort Branch, Indiana
Originally posted by REVHED
Yes, he does some circuit racing with his car but it is devoid of body kit and the suspension is based on the stock design. I posted the comment about the speeds he has done in response to people saying the 1st gen is too unstable at high speeds.
Yes, he does some circuit racing with his car but it is devoid of body kit and the suspension is based on the stock design. I posted the comment about the speeds he has done in response to people saying the 1st gen is too unstable at high speeds.