12a to 13b hypo
11-26-07 | 10:58 AM
#26
I'm not faulting you for trying, just for info that others may take as the best course when doing an upgrade when it isn't. Fwiw, the 2nd gen tank won't work, the filler is on the other side and the spare tire well would need to be completely removed. Even after that, the 2nd gen tank is taller and would hang lower.
If you want o be taken more seriously, you might work on your sentence structure. Your last post is painfully hard to understand.
If you want o be taken more seriously, you might work on your sentence structure. Your last post is painfully hard to understand.
yeah, us forum members dont like long reading. get to the point as in a 1-5 bullet points.
11-26-07 | 02:56 PM
#27
FB+FC=F-ME
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,353
Likes: 5
From: Rohnert Park CA
On the subject of the slosh/sump cups, the FC cups hold 4-5 times the volume that the SE ones do. There is also no difference that I'm aware of between the NA ad TII FC tanks, other than the pump and filter socks.
The dfference in the cups is one of the main reasons I feel one should modify their FB tank with an FC cup and in tank pump. Not only is it more reliable in the long run, it's a hell of a lot quieter too
The dfference in the cups is one of the main reasons I feel one should modify their FB tank with an FC cup and in tank pump. Not only is it more reliable in the long run, it's a hell of a lot quieter too
Quieter, and safer for the fuel pump, were my two main reasons for doing it.I cannot hear more than a faint whirring from my SupraTT pump unless I have my ear to the tank.
Also,the main reason why the FC cup is so much bigger is because the pump lives in there.The FC pump assembely displaces a fair amount of fuel when its in place,wheres the SE only has a pickup tube and small screen living in its slosh cup.I would be interested to find out how much volume is in each cup AFTER the correct pickup components are inserted into their affixed positions.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
